Plus : the source code for FM itself is available, I can hack it and break the buildchain : does this leads to enormous mail traffic on your mailbox ? If this is the case, we should consider a way to determine if a support request is made against a "vanilla" build of FM/AdobeMavenizedSDK or from an altered one (ala "tainted" in linux kernel world) and in such case, refuse to handle the support request.
My 0.02€ Le 08/03/2011 12:40, Marvin Froeder a écrit :
> I feel that I have to speak up now. Please define 'irresponsible'.Use the flex deployer tools to install flex SDK into maven repo, w/o even knowing what/why they are doing and screwing their build. People that use the tool simple because the tool existed. W/o any real need to use it.>Also I am interested to know who appointed you the gate keeper of 'responsible' SDK management All the guys that screwed their builds on a irrespossible use and then blame either me or flexmojos for the failures.Go ahead, become the SDK manager, I don't have any problems. But, a) I won't provide tools for it b) won't sanction as official flexmojos repo Both for the same reason, I won't deal with irresponsible users again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
