As soon as I have finished my current refactoring, I will certainly start digging into the caching stuf. Perhaps we should stay in contact and mabe we can get things working :-)
Chris 2011/4/28 Davis Ford <[email protected]>: > I'm giving up on copy-flex-resources to deal with this. It is just not > working. > > I'm using the maven assembly plugin instead. This way I have complete > control over what gets copied, and I control what dependencies and > artifacts and I control where it copies them from and where it copies > them to. > > I can do a binary diff between what's in the SDK and what is in the > sonatype repo, and I may have to do that, but it still doesn't resolve > all the issues I'm having. > > Even after I deployed the textLayout 1.1 swz to my LAN repo as > textLayout 4.1 swz, flexmojos copy-flex-resources still fails trying > to copy that file. It says the volumen or filename is incorrect, even > though the path is correct, the file does exist, and there are no > spaces/goofy characters in the filename. > > That's why I'm just going to use the assembly plugin. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Christofer Dutz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well couldn't you download the flex sdk in exaclty the same version >> from adobe >> (http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+4), >> unpack it and compare that to the textLayout.swf from flexmojos ... if >> those files match (which I would assume) then you can be certain that >> the corresponding swz file of that sdk is binary compatible. >> >> But after all I think your build might work by deploying it manually, >> but if Adobe goes offline the flash player will look for the version >> defined in the SDK (1.1.0.604) which it will not find in your rsl >> directory ... but that's just a guess. Think you should try that out. >> >> Chris >> >> 2011/4/28 Davis Ford <[email protected]>: >>> Yes, but that doesn't work. As noted on the comment at the bottom -- >>> textLayout is a different version. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Christofer Dutz >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Have you had a look at these links? >>>> https://docs.sonatype.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=7045277 >>>> https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-347 >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> 2011/4/28 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>: >>>>> Ok .. just had a look at this caching thing ... have to admit that I >>>>> haven't used it before ... but what I just saw certainly looks like I >>>>> should have a look at it ;-) >>>>> >>>>> 2011/4/28 Davis Ford <[email protected]>: >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Christofer Dutz >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Well I guess that the text-layout stuff in the flex sdk is version 1.1 >>>>>>> but the sdk version containing it is 4.1 so everything in the sdk is >>>>>>> deployed under the version 4.1 >>>>>>> Actually keeping track of the individual versions of parts of the sdk >>>>>>> would certainly make Velo go nuts withing weeks ;-) So you have to >>>>>>> think of the version more like "give me the version of textLayout that >>>>>>> is shipped with flex sdk 4.1.0.604" and not requesting the actual >>>>>>> version of the lib. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, I can concede that keeping track of this will make you loopy, >>>>>> but I guess what I was wondering is if they are binary compatible. If >>>>>> I depend on signed RSLs, and I spec copy-flex-resources, it fails >>>>>> trying to copy the textLayout 4.1 swz file to the webapp dir. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since this artifact doesn't exist in sonatype, I can deploy it locally >>>>>> to get past this, but I don't want to do that if they aren't binary >>>>>> compatible. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>>>> >>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected] >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>>> >>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> > > > > -- > Zeno Consulting, Inc. > home: http://www.zenoconsulting.biz > blog: http://zenoconsulting.wikidot.com > p: 248.894.4922 > f: 313.884.2977 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
