On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 10:14 PM, J_A_X <[email protected]> wrote:
> FM4 was still in beta. Most enterprise developers *do not touch* > anything with a beta tag because it is extremely risky and can break > the build. Even recent projects I've been on (where I had no say > about which version of FM we were using) was using 3.8 (I think?) > because it did everything we wanted it to do. > > Trust me, those same people would want that same goal in FM4, but they > haven't updated because it still had that beta moniker to it. Even a > release candidate is considered risky for any large enterprise RIA. > I should had released the pre-alpha as 4.0... FM3 I don't even run the tests for years now... but whatever.... I shall probably adopt some ubuntu like versioning.... 1108... year+month, not sure about that... I don't understand why you would remove a functionality altogether > unless there was a very good reason. I can understand if you don't > support it, but remove it? At least leave it in the code for people > to update it through github if need be. Complete new codebase. FM is all about new code. But I don't really wanna keep a piece of code that I don't know what it does and there is nobody maintain it, it is just more stuff to people complain that do not work and that bothers me. > Isn't that the whole point of open source? > Sure, sure, there are tons of contributions on flexmojos.... not sure if 10 lines of code got changed on last 6 months... Well, here it is flashbuilder goal to prove community commitment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
