Just to add my 50ct: In my experience FB really really sucks as soon as you are dealing with a lot of different Maven modules. We mooved away from FB after constantly wasting time while waiting for FB to be usable again. We are currently using IntelliJ for more than 2 Years and everytime I have to put my hands on the FB I feel like mooving out of my nice, warm flat, back into a Cave ;-)
With IntelliJ you don't need any big plugins. It seems to work nicely without. Chris 2011/8/8 J_A_X <[email protected]>: > Is there any way for you to do a quick port? I would be more than > happy to spend some time getting this to work with FM4. > > On Aug 7, 9:28 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 10:14 PM, J_A_X <[email protected]> wrote: >> > FM4 was still in beta. Most enterprise developers *do not touch* >> > anything with a beta tag because it is extremely risky and can break >> > the build. Even recent projects I've been on (where I had no say >> > about which version of FM we were using) was using 3.8 (I think?) >> > because it did everything we wanted it to do. >> >> > Trust me, those same people would want that same goal in FM4, but they >> > haven't updated because it still had that beta moniker to it. Even a >> > release candidate is considered risky for any large enterprise RIA. >> >> I should had released the pre-alpha as 4.0... FM3 I don't even run the >> tests for years now... but whatever.... I shall probably adopt some ubuntu >> like versioning.... 1108... year+month, not sure about that... >> >> I don't understand why you would remove a functionality altogether >> >> > unless there was a very good reason. I can understand if you don't >> > support it, but remove it? At least leave it in the code for people >> > to update it through github if need be. >> >> Complete new codebase. FM is all about new code. But I don't really wanna >> keep a piece of code that I don't know what it does and there is nobody >> maintain it, it is just more stuff to people complain that do not work and >> that bothers me. >> >> > Isn't that the whole point of open source? >> >> Sure, sure, there are tons of contributions on flexmojos.... not sure if 10 >> lines of code got changed on last 6 months... >> Well, here it is flashbuilder goal to prove community commitment. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
