Well said Simon. I have nothing to add. +1
On Dec 8, 6:48 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Remi P <[email protected]> wrote: > >I dont' understand the problem, FM 3.9 works using SDK 4.5.1 so of > >course > >it works using 4.6. > >It seems that the problem is just you don't have time to deploy 4.6 > >artefacts to the sonatype repository. > > No. This is not a deployment issue. It's a packaging issue. The big .zip blob > from adobe has to be splitted in dozens of maven artifacts which must remain > consistent with previous deployment and express correct dependencies > relations (there's not just a bunch of .swc). > > All of that has to be made with no support from Adobe and relatively frequent > changes in the way official releases are packaged. > > Moreover, velo must ensure it's done the right way or you will get back here > complaining about flexmojos tough the issue is related to SDK mavenization. > > This explains both why velo takes so much time to do it and why he doesn't > expose its tools : you'll use them to deploy broken SDK and will then get > back here with complaints. > > I think the alternative from velo's perspective is to work this out through > FME which will allow us to use directly adobe SDK .zip files and provides > enough $$ to make the user support sustainable. > > BTW, this is the current situation. I think it may change if the FM community > realize what opensource means and start giving back, contribute and support > the project. > > -- > Simon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
