From: Simon Fifield
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:50
AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 1.5
price
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Stuttaford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 18:46
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 1.5
price
Simon,
It is possible, currently, to use Flex
with FlashORB for remoting. Apart from the license, it’s perfectly
capable of being a standalone product… mxmlc.exe is the compiler, I
imagine a simple GUI for that would be all one would need.
Technically sensible, but I think
Macromedia want to regain some of their investment and let the current
incarnation mature somewhat. As Hans mentions below, I’m sure Macromedia
are aware that Flex could provide massive benefit outside of their current focus.
We’ll see, I guess J
Robert
From: Simon Fifield
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 07:30 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 1.5
price
Perhaps Macromedia are planning a version
of Flex that will allow the programmer to use MXML/Actionscript to generate an
SWF, without the whole Flex Server Side Application (sorry - Flex Enterprise Server!)
I imagine that the price for this would
still be more than Flash MX 2004 Pro say £1,200 or so. I would pay that. Of
course then connecting up to a server would still be a difficult task
especially when you've used Flex and its built in Flash Remoting
Gateway and experienced how easy it makes it. So small companies that
build web sites and small webapps would be able to take advantage of MXML
without having to use Flash to do the whole job. Of course they would still buy
Flash because its good or doing animation - just look at all those Flash Banner
ads.
Has this option been considered at
Macromedia?
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Omli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 18:16
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Flex 1.5
price
Macromedia selected the
medium/large enterprise as the beachhead to
establish
Flex as a worthwhile technology in the marketplace. With 200
customers
as of December, I'd say Macromedia has been quite successful
laying
this foundation. It seems to me the new pricing signals an even
greater
focus on this market segment as Flex moves from a technology used by
innovators
(most of us here) to a product for early adopters. Since early
adopters
are most willing to pay high prices for the right to use a new
product,
the new pricing seems to make sense. I had expected new pricing in
the
2.0 timeframe since this would be a natural point for transitioning from
a
technology to a product focus, but can see that early adopters are
probably
more interested in development support than they are in additional
functionality
at this point in the adoption life cycle. So, from that
standpoint,
the recent price changes combined with bundled support make a
whole
lot of business sense.
Most
of the friction around Flex pricing is more a question of target market
than
anything else, with the high level of friction in forums like this
indicating
to me there is significant demand for technology like Flex coming
from
many other markets outside of medium/large enterprises. I will be
curious
to see if/how Macromedia expands Flex into a more mainstream market.
I
suppose in some sense this has already begun with the limited use of Flex
in
ColdFusion MX 7. Nonetheless, it seems there is still quite a bit of
money
on the table for Laszlo and others to pursue... at least for now.