I’d also like to see MM implement
the “optional” xpath functionality…
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:25
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] More
interesting than Zorn? - Details on Flex 2.0.....
- >> The Flex
>> programming model will also leverage
new industry standards, suck as E4X
>> (ECMAScript for XML)
I assume we are talking about a flash player
implementation (Flex & Flash) ?
On 6/7/05, Aldo Bucchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E4X is worth the WOOOW!
> on one side it is a very smart
technology.
> on the other, talks about Macromedia
seriously committing to embracing
> the ECMA standards to a broad extent.
Excellent.
>
> Check out Jon Udell's introduction for a
quick overview
> http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2004/09/29.html
>
> ...or if you are seriously bored, take a
look at the published standard
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm
>
> Best Regards,
> Aldo
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- RE: [flexcoders] More interesting than Zorn? - Details on Fl... Rick Bullotta
-