Hi Clint, you can't use interfaces as the name of
the source in RemoteObject, since we do a Class.forName() call for the
name. It's really not possible for such a thing to ever work, since
something needs to be instantiated for the RemoteObject. You should be
able to use a class that implements an interface, though.
-Brian
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clint Modien
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:09 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Java intefaces as remote objects?
Instead of using POJO's can we use Java Intefaces definitions
instead?
When a guy on our team tested it he got a class instantiation
error...
If the answer is no then I gess I could add it to the wish list for
2.0.
Thanks
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
