The danger of persistent connections is
one of scaleability…and of trying to manage a reliable protocol across
those connections (as opposed to the relative simplicity of a request/response
protocol). A hybrid that we’ve used is a server-based
“collector” (listener) and clients that “ping” (a
euphemism for lightweight polling) to see if there’s something for them
to do. The other advantage of polling is “pacing”
– you can manage the rate at which events/messages get exchanged even
when “bursts” of events occur. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alberto Albericio Salvador Hi all, -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ---- LSpots keywords ?> ---- HM ADS ?> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and more Alberto Albericio Salvador
- RE: [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and more Rick Bullotta
- Re: [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and mo... Alberto Albericio Salvador
- RE: [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and more Abdul Qabiz
- Re: [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and mo... Alberto Albericio Salvador
- RE: [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and more Abdul Qabiz
- RE: [flexcoders] Flex, Remoting and more Erik Westra