> In theory, you've got an additional function call, but in practice, that will not make a difference.
Do you? I mean he does not have to over head (what little it may be) of the super classes methods and calls. I'm sure this is a trivial answer of it doesn't matter. :) Mike On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Maciek Sakrejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Unless Flex is doing something really crazy, that should be fine. The > only caveat is that, of course, you'll have to implement all the > IEventDispatcher methods yourself, but you can just pass these off to a > nested EventDispatcher object. In theory, you've got an additional > function call, but in practice, that will not make a difference. > -- > Maciek Sakrejda > Truviso, Inc. > http://www.truviso.com > > > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:17 +0000, reflexactions wrote: > > Is there a performance difference between having a class extend > > EventDispatcher vs implementing IEventDispatcher. > > > > Reason for the question is I have a class which currently extends > > EventDispatcher and now it needs to extend another class that is not > > an > > EventDispatcher. This will get properly fixed up in a few days but > > temporarily the answer is to have it implement IEventDispatcher but I > > was wondering if it is going to effect performance in any way ... > > > > tks > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com Teoti Graphix Blog http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'.
