If it were me, I would leave the java and as objects as they were and create a
new class extending the java object. Now you can add all the properties that
hibernate wants and send it.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ouaqa <a...@...> wrote:
>
>
> I am developping a J2EE/Flex Application and we recently decided to switch to
> hibernate to handle our database management strategy.
>
> The java/as mapping worked real smoothly before. All properties declared in
> java objects were also declared in as object.
>
> When switching to hibernate, i had to add some properties to the java
> objects, in order to have all my fields declared in the object.
> So now, the java object has more properties than the actionscript object and
> therefore, i get a #1056 error when creating the object ("Cannot create
> property XXX on object myObject").
>
> I do not wish to add these missing properties in actionscript so this is why
> I would like to know how to not map a java attribute to it's
> actionscript-sided object.
>
> sorry about my english, frenchy @ work ...
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/How-Could-I-%22not%22-map-a-property-to-lcds-object---tp23059499p23059499.html
> Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
