This is an option but i was wondering if you couldn't use some special "ninja" keyword telling lcds not to map the field to lcds.
Still, thanks for the suggestion, valdhor valdhor-3 wrote: > > If it were me, I would leave the java and as objects as they were and > create a new class extending the java object. Now you can add all the > properties that hibernate wants and send it. > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ouaqa <a...@...> wrote: >> >> >> I am developping a J2EE/Flex Application and we recently decided to >> switch to >> hibernate to handle our database management strategy. >> >> The java/as mapping worked real smoothly before. All properties declared >> in >> java objects were also declared in as object. >> >> When switching to hibernate, i had to add some properties to the java >> objects, in order to have all my fields declared in the object. >> So now, the java object has more properties than the actionscript object >> and >> therefore, i get a #1056 error when creating the object ("Cannot create >> property XXX on object myObject"). >> >> I do not wish to add these missing properties in actionscript so this is >> why >> I would like to know how to not map a java attribute to it's >> actionscript-sided object. >> >> sorry about my english, frenchy @ work ... >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/How-Could-I-%22not%22-map-a-property-to-lcds-object---tp23059499p23059499.html >> Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-Could-I-%22not%22-map-a-property-to-lcds-object---tp23059499p23061699.html Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com.