Care to elaborate with an example?
-TH
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Richard Rodseth <rrods...@...> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't extend either of these. Favour delegation over inheritance.
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Tim Hoff timh...@... wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Yep, thought that I could get away with not testing it. Doesn't look
like
> > you can extend Array, but you can extend ArrayCollection:
> >
> > *package
> > *{
> > * import* mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
> > *
> > public* *class* MatRix *extends* ArrayCollection
> > {
> > * public* *function* MatRix(numRows:int=0,numCols:int=0)
> > {
> > * for* (*var* i:int=0;i<numRows;i++)
> > {
> > * this*.addItem( *new* Array(numCols) );
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Test:
> >
> > *var* a:MatRix = *new* MatRix(3,3);
> > a[0][1] = *"test"*;
> > *trace*(a[0][1]);
> >
> > -TH
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "smitade" smitade@ wrote:
> > >
> > > This compiles OK but fails at this point in the class:
> > >
> > > this[i]=new Array(numCols);
> > >
> > > with the error: Cannot create property 0 on [the class] i.e i
being 0 on
> > the first for loop when calling:
> > >
> > > var a:MatRix = new MatRix(3,3);
> > >
> >
> >
>
