Hi all,

This mailling lixt is now over 146.000 messages posted.
Most answers to possible questions are already here, for the trouble of a 
search.
This accumulated wealth of information extends over many years...

so to cut a long story.., I vote for this "flexcoders" mailing list!
(and a simple question: where was the flex developers forum, when needed?)

Thanks,
George 

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Gregor Kiddie" <gkid...@...> wrote:
>
> It kind of works...
> 
>  
> 
> It only mangles some code samples, I've never had problems with the
> subject lines (though I know others have), and I get threading via
> outlook some of the time (though outlook has the same problem with this
> mailing list).
> 
>  
> 
> It's usable enough for me to prefer it over actually visiting the
> forums.
> 
>  
> 
> Gregor Kiddie
> Senior Developer
> INPS
> 
> Tel:       01382 564343
> 
> Registered address: The Bread Factory, 1a Broughton Street, London SW8
> 3QJ
> 
> Registered Number: 1788577
> 
> Registered in the UK
> 
> Visit our Internet Web site at www.inps.co.uk
> <blocked::http://www.inps.co.uk/> 
> 
> The information in this internet email is confidential and is intended
> solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it
> by anyone else is not authorised. Any views or opinions presented are
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> INPS or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient
> please contact is.helpd...@...
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Tom Chiverton
> Sent: 13 August 2009 16:39
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> On Thursday 13 Aug 2009, Gregor Kiddie wrote:
> > It does have to be said, I use the Mailing list functionality of the
> > Adobe forums rather than visiting the forum directly...
> 
> Last time I checked, this was utterly broken. With mangled bodies,
> mangled 
> subject lines and the lack of correct headers to allow threading.
>


Reply via email to