Wouldn't BlazeDS be the upgrade path for the 'no charge' versions? I'm on unclear on the exact differences, but I thought LCDS had more advanced push / real time capabilities. Apps that truly need that are rare in my experience.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "busitech" <m...@...> wrote: > > I'm curious how many of your projects were deployed into production using the > no-charge Single CPU (or the 100-user departmental) licenses of LCDS 2.x. > > Since the release of LCDS 3.0, neither of these licenses exist. This leaves > our small business customers running in production using the Single CPU > license with no upgrade path going forward, unless they can come up with the > steep license fees for ES2. I doubt any of our customers will be able to > afford it. > > Needless to say, this seriously impedes our ability to do business on the > LCDS platform going forward in the SMB market we serve. It also leaves our > hands tied with respect to the software we've already developed and deployed. > BlazeDS is not an option - it would require a total rewrite of client and > server, and mass annihilation of features. > > How are these changes affecting your business? >
