Anyone???  Anything???

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Jake Churchill <reyna...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> I have a mobile application that was created last year using FlashBuilder
> 4.6 (AIR 3.4).  It's a pretty basic app, in that it just interacts with
> data from a server.  There is one view that interacts with CameraRoll and
> the CameraUI, but that's it.
>
> The initial build of the app went through Apple's approval process
> successfully.  I have since upgraded to FlashBuilder 4.7 and set it up to
> use the sdk with the AIR 3.4 (default is 3.1 I think).
>
> A bug was found in the app which required a simple test to see if an
> ArrayCollection existed, if not I created a blank one.  I re-compiled and
> re-submitted the new .ipa and now Apple is coming back saying an
> Entitlement is missing:
>
> *Missing Push Notification Entitlement - Your app appears to register
> with the Apple Push Notification service, but the app signature's
> entitlements do not include the "aps-environment" entitlement. If your app
> uses the Apple Push Notification service, make sure your App ID is enabled
> for Push Notification in the Provisioning Portal, and resubmit after
> signing your app with a Distribution provisioning profile that includes the
> "aps-environment" entitlement.
> *
>
> I've been searching for solutions to this or other people with the same
> problem but have not found anything.  I'm wondering if Flashbuilder 4.7 has
> a default entitlement somewhere that's being compiled into the application.
>  I'm not sure that's the case because in the binary area in itunes connect,
> the entitlements section is as follows:
>
> *MY APP NAME*
> get-task-allow: false
> application-identifier: MY APP PACKAGE
>
> In the mean time, I've still got FlashBuilder 4.6 so I'm going to try to
> compile the app there and submit.  However, if Apple is saying it appears
> the app registers with the Apple Push Notification service, I'm at a loss
> because we don't use that for anything.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Jake
>

Reply via email to