Thanks for your time everyone.
Because we have barely scratched the surface with Flex, I am asking stupid questions probably ... apologies if it's coming across as obtuse.
I think I was getting confused because "mxml is the class". Call me slow on the uptake! I only just clicked that separating the code from the mxml makes no difference semantically -- seems more of an ideological debate than anything else. I'm not a big fan of those! I can see why Steven's initial response was kind of blase. I think we'll go with the grain on this one and just stuff AS into our mxml. If it bites us later we'll just refactor.
On 11/4/05, Steven Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The existence of ActionScript code in the MXML file or not, has never impacted on the strategy for skinning.
Good to hear.
For the psycho-analytically inclined, you can see the process of paradigm-shifting going on in glorious technicolour as I continue to ask silly questions and then back down ;-)
But you're probably accustomed to that on this list.
Jules
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
| Web site design development | Software design and development | Macromedia flex |
| Software development best practice |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
