Hmm... Thats an interesting response.
So all of us who have developed solutions with remoting really didnt need it anyway. Aside from the fact that he was asking about amphp which has nothing to do with java, remoting does offer benefits over web services (aside from avoiding the reconfiguring ones server side implementation) which have been debated and discussed ad infinitum and I will not restate here. Regards Hank On 12/15/05, Dave Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't understand why you can't simply use <mx:WebService/> to > replace <mx:RemoteObject> in most cases. Using AXIS you can use the > exact same POJO you might have used in a <mx:RemoteObject/> and do so > without the need for any gateway. > > - > Dave Wolf > Cynergy Systems, Inc. > Macromedia Flex Alliance Partner > http://www.cynergysystems.com > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Office: 866-CYNERGY > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As far as I know there is not yet. > > > > There was some discussion about this on the flashcoders list when > > flex2 came out. I made a pretty big deal about the fact that the docs > > seem to indicate that standard remoting will not be something that is > > supported. > > > > Mike Chambers (a MM employee) indicated that it was supported. But > > what he meant was that it was supported at a super low level and you > > would essentially have to write all the low level remoting code for > > this. > > > > It seemed pretty clear to me that their intent was to, ahem, > > **encourage** remoting users to buy cold fusion or Flex Data Services, > > in order to do painless remoting, and that they were essentially > > orphaning anyone who was not doing remoting with one of their pricey > > gateways. > > > > Now, perhaps this post will bring adobe employees out of the woodwork > > crying foul and saying I am wrong. But the fact that there is any > > ambiguity about this isssue, is, in and of itself, a real problem. > > > > The fact that that there is not some strong statement of continued > > **full** support for traditional remoting is, to me, shameful. > > > > Regards > > Hank > > > > On 12/15/05, Flapflap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > Because RemoteObject isn't available on Alpha is there a way to > use flex > > > 2 with amf php ? > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > > > By the way : Hello World ! > > > I'm new to this list. > > > -- > > > Flapflap > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
