the fact that method signatures are not polymorphic when implementing an interface or overriding a function is a real pain in the .... behind.
now in my interface i have to create a function as such
interface IBla
{
function clone():IBla
}
but two levels down the line when i have extended this interface with another i want my clone to return a more concrete type, and then each of my classes that implement this interface their clone methods would ideally return their own type.
yet all these classes implement IBla in some fashion either directly or indirectly so... anyway polymorphic function signatures would be nice.
thanks
johan
--
j:pn
http://www.lennel.org
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
| Web site design development | Computer software development | Software design and development |
| Macromedia flex | Software development best practice |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
