awesome! time to read those eclipse plug in docs!

Till Schneidereit wrote:
The stand alone version of FB2 is pretty much a customized distribution of Eclipse based on (at the moment) Eclipse 3.1.2, so you get all the functionality and extensibility of Eclipse.
The major difference is that many of the features that come preinstalled with the default distribution of Eclipse (the JDT, for example) aren't bundled with FB2, while the Flex Builder feature is.

Bottomline: If you plan on working with more than just Flex in the same IDE, you're probably better off choosing the plugin. If on the other hand, you pretty much only do Flex based stuff anyway, you should use the FB2 distribution.

cheers,
till

judah wrote:
  
The Adobe site says that Flex Builder 2.0 can be installed as a standard 
desktop application or as a plug-in to the Eclipse 3.1 IDE. If it is 
installed as a standard desktop application does it lose any support for 
plug-ins?

For example, can I make a plug-in or panel for the Flex Builder IDE? Is 
there any documentation on this?

Thanks,
Judah


    

  


-- 
"Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any one thing."

"You can have anything you want - if you want it badly enough. You can be anything you want to be, do anything you set out to accomplish if you hold to that desire with singleness of purpose." 

- Abraham Lincoln


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development
Macromedia flex Software development best practice


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to