Thomas,
 
I'm not a lawyer, but I see no reason you cannot rename the package structures if you have need to do so.  Consult the license, but I would *expect* you are obliged to keep the (c) notice and the license file in any distributions, but you are free to use and modify the source.
 
Reminder.  I'm not a lawyer :)
 
Best,
 
Steven
 
Steven Webster
Practice Director (Rich Internet Applications)
Adobe Consulting
Westpoint, 4 Redheughs Rigg, South Gyle, Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ, UK
p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108
m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Rühl -akitogo-
Sent: 06 July 2006 10:53
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] [Flex2] Changes to the Cairngorm package structure


Hello list,

I just came across a question of architecture and I'm not quite sure, if
it is well... sort of "allowed" to do what I'm about to do. Thing is,
for the particular situation that I'm dealing with, I'd need to refactor
Cairngorm regarding its package structure. Now, since this is Adobe's
thing here, I don't know whether that correspond their licensing in
terms of usage. Maybe someone, maybe folks from Adobe, could give me
some hint here.

Thanks and cheers,
Thomas

------------------------------------

Thomas Rühl
Design, Programming & Concepts

akitogo OHG
Hanauer Landstrasse 188
60314 Frankfurt

Telefon +49 (0) 69 800 69 445
Fax +49 (0) 69 800 69 449
Mobil +49 (0) 179 750 75 87
E-Mail thomas.ruehl@akitogo.com
Web http://www.akitogo.com

------------------------------------

__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to