Hi Tim, Well, my first impression is that it’s
pretty complex, at least a lot more complex than just creating ASP.NET Web
services and calling them from flex. Apparently you need to place all your remote
methods in xml config files. Etc. The tutorials from http://www.themidnightcoders.com/articles/datamanagement-part3.htm
help a lot, but it’s still a huge change, also in the way of thinking. (eg
updating data with the sync methods, changeobjects etc). Also you use a lot
more databinding, whereas with web services you just fill your datagrid or
treeview with the data you receive, and in the case of an update, you will
probably use a web service too to update the current row. Here you just omit your
changes to your dataService, and he handles all the rest. I think the Flex + .NET + WebORB community
is pretty small at the moment though, so it would be nice of some gurus from
this list play a bit with it like I’m doing right now. Jonas From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hoff Hey Jonas,
-- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- RE: [flexcoders] WebORB for .net beta5: feedback Jonas Windey
- [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta5: feedback Tim Hoff
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta5: feedba... Jonas Windey
- [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta5: feedba... Tim Hoff
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta5: fe... Jason Hawryluk
- [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta5: feedba... mpiller
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta5... Jonas Windey
- [flexcoders] Re: WebORB for .net beta... Mark Piller