I don't think this is necessary. I gave a pointer to how to recompile it because someone asked, but it is deliberate that we only ship a single swc: as I said, when you link that swc into your project, it strips out all the debug information. There is no performance or size hit on your swf. The Ant process is intended to be for people who really want to do some advanced stuff, like modify the flex framework, but for almost all users, it shouldn't be necessary.
The one use case where you might be right -- and I'm kind of unclear on this -- is the case where you want to dynamically link to the swc at runtime. Does that make sense? The expert on all this stuff is out on vacation right now -- I probably shouldn't have injected myself into this so deeply, because I'm the debugger guy, not the RSL/linker guy; I don't know all the subtle details of RSLs. When the RSL/linker guy gets back, I'll ask him about this. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Anatole Tartakovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mike, > It might make sense to have separate folder in SDK with all the libraries > compiled without debugging for size/performance reasons. Realistically, > every production application would like to benefit from that and subjecting > everybody to Ant process - especially given the additional libs like fds, > rpc, etc that come without sources. Please let me know if I should file > feature request or if it is already done. > Sincerely, > Anatole Tartakovsky > > > > On 9/28/06, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Are you changing them to be external, rather than statically linked > > into your app? Because if you're leaving them statically linked into > > your app (the default), then there is no need to recompile them with - > > debug=false; at link time, if linking the release swf, the linker will > > strip out all of the debug information. > > > > If you are changing them to be external, then... take a look at > > frameworks/build_framework.xml (an Ant script). I haven't tried it and > > don't know much about it. > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders% 40yahoogroups.com>, "Anatole > > Tartakovsky" > > <anatole.tartakovsky@> wrote: > > > > > > Mike, > > > Is there way to get standard libraries (framework, rpc, flex, etc) > > built > > > with -debug=false > > > Thank you, > > > Anatole > > > > > > > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
