> This is (i think) why they are stored in a different place, it might even help prove performance (again, i think).

 

You're right on both counts. This is a major reason why ActionScript 3 is faster than ActionScript 2.

 

- Gordon

 


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of EECOLOR
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 1:29 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] var in Loop

 

Hello,

 

Its not that the concept of the for..in loop has changed (i think), but the way classes are defined internally has changed.

 

Properties and methods of classes that are defined inside the class definition will not change at runtime. This is (i think) why they are stored in a different place, it might even help prove performance (again, i think). So for the runtime player they are actually something else then the dynamic properties of an object (or an array).

 

I hope this helps in any way.

 

 

Greetz Erik

__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to