Ideas from Adobe employees like these might help convince ur I.T CEO,
Managers, Clients etc and show examples of what people are doing with
Flex.

http://www.onflex.org/ted/2006/12/surfacing-flex.php

http://www.flickr.com/photos/flexapps/





--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "dorkie dork from dorktown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree Paul for the most part but at the same time I have two
theories on
> it.
> 
> 1. It's the little dogs that bark the loudest. The big dogs don't
have to.
> If Adobe / Macromedia team is confident in their work then word of mouth
> will spread it. It will get a reputation by virtue of its value.
> 
> 2. The campaigns they've launched, labs.adobe.com, dev center, support
> groups, developer relations, component developer relations, etc are all
> actions that say they are laying the groundwork and foundation for
things to
> come. I would say they are building the Flex ecosystem among the current
> Flash / Flex / ColdFusion developer community before inviting those
that are
> not already part of it.
> 
> And then I disagree with my point number one. The web is very large.
Getting
> the word out there for people to know that it exists is important.
Many do
> not know about it. So marketing is important. But I do not like some
tactics
> in Marketing. In most marketing they are sleazy and deceptive.
Advertisers
> promote something that in reality what it is not. So they may be
waiting for
> a time when they think it is ready and matured to a point they want
to then
> go for it. If it was me, when I thought it was ready, I would aim at
making
> Flex known and what it does for you without glamorization.
> 
> But as Tariq said, if no one knows about it they do not feel safe
adopting
> it. The only way I've got my Flex app in the door is because I knew the
> project manager. He had never heard of Flex. If Flex was mentioned
in Java
> Developers journal magazines he would know about it. Everyone was
expecting
> me to do AJAX. They thought that was "hot s**t". :P
> 
> They didnt know that Flex / Flash had any sort of capabilites similar to
> ajax.
> 
> @Matt Chotin -
> 
>  So where do they hear about other technologies?  Are they reading
certain
> publications?  Blogs?  When they talk about other technologies do they
> actually know what they're talking about or is it just repeating the
buzz?
> 
> Other developers at work hear about technology through Java Conferences,
> magazines (JDJ), word of mouth, blogs. The project managers and his
boss'
> conception of Flash was flashy animation and games.
> 
> Friends who are not programmers know all about ajax from digg and tech
> feeds. One friend was all stoked about ajax and web 2.0 and crap
like that
> and I had to explain it all to him. Those outside of the industry
are mostly
> repeating the buzz.
> 
> Now, once you get their attention with marketing and buzz words and
ability
> you have one more hurdle to overcome before adoption. The entry point is
> rather steep as well. For all it can do it's definately worth it but, it
> still remains out of the reach of many. Flex Elements may help an early
> adoption rate especially to cross over developers from Java, HTML,
AJAX, who
> are wary of such a huge investment. Sorry to get off the marketing
topic but
> I believe it is related. Either that or give many of the popular
tech blogs
> a promotion code to put on their site for Flex Builder for 100% off or
> something.
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/4/06, Paul Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Is it just me that thinks Adobe is doing fine just as they are? I
think
> > the real Flex breakthroughs will come as developers start
releasing clever
> > apps and people start saying "holy s**t".
> >
> > I happen to think that the developer support by Adobe (and Macromedia
> > before them) is phenomenal.  Flex will move forward quietly until
it hits
> > it's tipping point, then adoption will surge ahead.
> >
> > Don't worry too much about promoting Flex - let your applications
do that
> > for you.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > *From:* Tariq Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:58 PM
> > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Flex Marketing
> >
> > I'd agree to that. The marketing effort seems to heavily rely on the
> > development community doing that job for them. Things like labs
and DevNet
> > are KEY to maximizing technology adoption - but people need to
know about it
> > in the first place.
> >
> > To Restate Adobe's Goal: 1 000 000 Flex Developers by 2010.
> >
> > Some HEAVY DUTY marketing is needed. It definitely made sense to
capture
> > those who are most amiable to Flex (CF and Flash developers) first
and grow
> > from there. I think someone blogged about this before; in that of
course
> > Adobe related blogs are going to be heavy proponents for Adobe
technologies.
> > But now it's time to penetrate into the rest of the world.
> >
> > In polling my heavy duty tech friends in other industries, they BARELY
> > know what Flex is. Many haven't heard of it. And some have heard
of it, just
> > because they heard me mention it.
> >
> > Awareness of the brand and technology needs to be more prevalent.
> >
> > Gimme a cool Flex decal and I'll put it on my car! :)
> >
> >
> >
> > Clint Modien wrote:
> >
> >  I mentioned this @ the Silicon Valley Flex User Group meeting the
> > other day but I wanted to reiterate it here and see if I could invoke
> > a response from Adobe.
> >
> > Mr. Mendels?
> >
> > Where is the marketing for Flex? Why keep the most beautiful
> > framework in the world for creating applications a secret? Where are
> > the Visual Studio style banner adds everywhere. Where is the buzz for
> > it on Slashdot. Why arn't other developers in the world standing up
> > and saying is creating applications really this easy!?!
> >
> > I've seen the lights go on in a developers eyes when they get it.
> > When they see what 5 lines of code can acomplish with Flex. They get
> > excited. Excitement sells licenses.
> >
> > (Gets off his soapbox and points to it...) ... Thoughts?
> >
> >
> >  
> >
>


Reply via email to