Hi Roger, Could you clarify a little bit more about the 'cross-swf font access problem?' I think there are a number of developers who have tried to get that working, but haven't been able to get things completely working.
Thanks, -Daniel Roger Gonzalez wrote: > > What is the issue with "smaller swf output file sizes"? > > If you use link-report and load-externs, you can optimize swf size for > both the modules and the main app without any issues. > > Just out of curiosity, have you filed any bugs regarding the other > issues you've encountered? (Cross-SWF font access is a problem at the > player level, but the other stuff is all fixable.) > > -rg > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bjorn Schultheiss > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:00 PM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference > > Shaun, > > > Smaller Swf output file sizes, > Module support within the mx framework, > Module support within Cairngorm, > Issues with Viewstacks and Binding, > Embedding Fonts, > > I think there are a couple more as well. > > > Bjorn > > > On 08/03/2007, at 1:11 PM, shaun wrote: > >> Bjorn Schultheiss wrote: >> > Hey Alex, >> > >> > After your experience with modules do you believe it was the >> correct >> > decision to include it in 2.01 as opposed to waiting for 3.0? >> ! > Over here we just refactored away from modules to the mon! >> olithic ria >> > because of outstanding issues.. >> > >> >> What are the outstanding issues? >> >> cheers, >> - shaun >> > >
