I read it earlier.
Its hard to say exactly why it fails.
There are a few ways it can happen. But i dont think there is a limit
to the amount of bindings in an application.
You can use the debugger to see when databinding fails. Usually you
will eventually step into the databinding error handling method.
1 cause of Binding failing can be when your destination has been
removed.
I guess if you can find ways of optimizing bindings than perhaps it
may be worth writing your own.
Plus you can always use whats existing as a reference.
Mind you i have yet to implement my own version of Binding yet, but i
dont believe it will be too difficult.
On 02/04/2007, at 4:53 PM, iko_knyphausen wrote:
Ok, got you...
I have another post out there regarding binding problems...
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/70163
Maybe you know an answer to that one too ;-) (praying)
Thx
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bjorn Schultheiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where you change the value that is being Binded to.
> eg.
>
> <mx:Text text="{model.text}" />
>
> // in a command or equivalent
> model.text = param1;
> model.otherVal = param2;
>
> If binding throws an error on line1 of the command, it can prevent
> line 2 from executing
>
>
> On 02/04/2007, at 4:33 PM, iko_knyphausen wrote:
>
> >
> > Hm, how about data binding that is done declarative - meaning
in curly
> > braces... there is no code block per se?
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bjorn Schultheiss
> > bjorn.schultheiss@ wrote:
> > >
> > > DataBinding is funny like that.
> > > Once it fails it stop execute any further in the code block.
> > >
> > > I think at this stage it may be worth writing our own
versions of
> > > databinding that handle as we wish.
> > >
> > > On 02/04/2007, at 4:11 PM, iko_knyphausen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Same here... I am wondering whether its VISTA related
(which I am
> > > > running on my box)? Basically, if there is a trigger for a
runtime
> > > > error, such as e.g. referencing a null pointer, the
function with
> > the
> > > > culprit will stop executing, but the rest will continue...
makes
> > > > debugging kind of tedious...
> > > >
> > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Ralph Hauwert" r.hauwert@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > If recently (since FB 2.0.1) been experiencing several cases
> > > > where my
> > > > > code would fail silently at runtime, not coming up with a
> > runtime
> > > > > error at all, and just stopping code execution,
restarting at
> > the
> > > > next
> > > > > logical step. Is there something I have missed in the
release
> > > > notes of
> > > > > FB2.0.1 ?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ralph Hauwert
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
