Hi Mark, That is true, AMFPHP with the native AMFText, is faster is great, but just a few providers offers this native serialization.
In my test I used normal, AMFPHP Vs, WebOrb, because my provider don't offer to me the native serialization. I tell you I loved WebOrb, was cool and easy, vs the before version of AMFPHP with "comics" $MethodName... und so weiter... but now AMFPHP is more clear and better performance. I going to check againg my test, and I talk you when WebOrb, comming better, I changed againg for WebOrb. and made this public. I check (one by week) what's comming on in WebOrb. go ahead !!!, Viele Grüße, Guillermo 10 Apr 2007 12:58:12 -0700, Mark Piller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Guillermo, Are you talking about the release of AMFPHP that introduced native (C) AMF serialization? If that's the case, then obviously the implementation would be faster. However, in a real-world scenario does it really matter if the serialization time is 50ms vs. 200ms when the actual method invocation takes 2 seconds? :) Additionally, I heard people saying it is quite hard to find a hosting provider willing to deploy a custom native PHP module (which is what C serializer for AMFPHP is). Cheers, Mark --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "guillermo Pared" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > WebORB, is really cool and easy, I love it, but I have to say too, that with > the last releaseof AMFPHP, the performance is really good or better than > WebORB. > > I changed the engine for AMFPHP beacuse hat better performance, > > I look forward for new enhanced that Mark and his team made in WebORB for > PHP, > > Best, > > Guillermo > > 10 Apr 2007 09:22:30 -0700, Mark Piller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > WebORB for PHP is available as an open source and commercial product > > today and it will stay that way. There are no plans to stop the open > > source offering. On the contrary, we have grand plans for it later > > this year. > > > > Cheers, > > Mark > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "nxzone" > > <nxzone@> wrote: > > > > > > It's a OpenSource project and it's better to use OpenSource > > > solutions... You think WebORB will be only commercial in few years? > > > The free PHP version is not usable for a big project? > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/timeline/ > > > http://www.ideeclic.com/clients/133-cspi/v6/ > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Sajid > > Hussain <enchanter_saj@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > WebOrb are just ready to show Thier commercial edition with > > > DataManagment like Flex Data Services ,if u could buy that in future > > > then go for weborb php > > > > else amfphp 1.9 seems also good and I hope not surely when but they > > > realy shud do something more then RPC calls in it.amfphp is working > > > with flash from good time > > > > > > > > Let me KNow which framework u r going to use for ur application I am > > > also confused > > > > I tried for zend but it seems maybe have to go for cakeamf but > > > current version dont work with amf 1.9 > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > nxzone <nxzone@> wrote: Which > > > between these both do you prefer? Which want is more stable, > > > > fast, simple.... > > > > > > > > WebORB VS AMFPHP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > Don't pick lemons. > > > > See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
