Yeah, my question was opperating on the assumption that something will go wrong. Because in my experience no matter how good framework devs are, it seems like upgrades always cause problems for someone's code (In other words, I'm worried about that 0.1 percent you mentioned that will need work). And this time my code definitely has the potential to be that code. I haven't played with Flex 3 much yet, so maybe my app will work perfectly in Flex 3. If not, I'm not looking forward to bug fixing my code base for Flex 3 (a pain which would be roughly related to the size of the codebase). Call if paranoia if you want. I guess I'll find out when I get there...or Adobe could decide to sign a Flex 2.0.1 framework RSL :)
- Dan Freiman On 10/18/07, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 18 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I know the Flex 3 sdk will be required for framework caching, but Flex > > Builder 3 can compile Flex 2 code. If I chose this option will there a > > digitally signed release of the Flex 2 framework. > > No, only Adobe can sign RSLs, and I haven't seen any indication they'll do > so > for a Flex 2 framework. > > > upgrade my code to work with the Flex 3 framework just to gain this > > functionality. > > As far as I can tell, 99.9% of applications need no work to go from Flex 2 > to > 3. > > > Also, it seems to me that developers with larger projects > > will have more incentive to create framework caching projects, but will > > also have the hardest time upgrading their project from flex 2 to 3 > because > > of their large code base. > > You change one option in Builders properties (or add a few arguments to > mxmlc), and it's done. > How is this hard, or dependant on the size of the code base ? > > -- > Tom Chiverton. Are you a great Flex programmer, who knows Cairngorm, and > has > done some ColdFusion work ? Would you like to work for a top 30 law firm > in > Manchester, UK ? Are not an agency ? If yes, send email ! > > **************************************************** > > This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. > > Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England > and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address > is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is > available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a > partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells > LLP. Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority. > > CONFIDENTIALITY > > This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and > may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you > must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it > nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its > existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please > delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. > > For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
