Many thanks Darrell, now i uderstand why getting error.
And -static-rsls=false keep my build.xml much more clean and easy to
read, and avoid configuration problems.
Thanks again.

Just one more question about flash player, why adobe don't put flex
framework inside Flash Player? It will make Flex be amazing plataform
even for small websites and app, confroting ajax in your best vantage
on flex, the size of files without any first huge loading.

Here i paste my build.xml file content for some day anyone had same
questions:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project name="PainelAdmApp" default="compile">


        <property name="flex.mxmlc" location="C:\Program Files\Adobe\Flex
Builder 3\sdks\3.0.0\bin\mxmlc.exe" />
        <property name="flashplayer" location="C:\Program Files\Adobe\Flex
Builder 3\Player\win\FlashPlayer.exe" />
        <property name="deploy.dir" value="bin" />

        <target name="compile">
                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        
                        <arg line="PainelAdmApp.mxml -static-rsls=false
-target-player=9.0.60 -services services-config.xml
-link-report=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output
${deploy.dir}/PainelAdmApp.swf "/>
                </exec>         

                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        <arg line="Admin.mxml -static-rsls=false 
-target-player=9.0.60
-load-externs=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output ${deploy.dir}/Admin.swf" />
                </exec>
                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        <arg line="Equipamentos.mxml -static-rsls=false
-target-player=9.0.60 -load-externs=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output
${deploy.dir}/Equipamentos.swf" />
                </exec>
                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        <arg line="Servicos.mxml -static-rsls=false 
-target-player=9.0.60
-load-externs=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output
${deploy.dir}/Servicos.swf" />
                </exec>
                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        <arg line="Mineradoras.mxml -static-rsls=false
-target-player=9.0.60 -load-externs=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output
${deploy.dir}/Mineradoras.swf" />
                </exec>
                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        <arg line="Links.mxml -static-rsls=false 
-target-player=9.0.60
-load-externs=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output ${deploy.dir}/Links.swf" />
                </exec>
                <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." failonerror="false"
failifexecutionfails="no">
                        <arg line="Headlines.mxml -static-rsls=false 
-target-player=9.0.60
-load-externs=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output
${deploy.dir}/Headlines.swf" />
                </exec>
        </target>       
   
</project>      


 
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Darrell Loverin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I clipped this output from entering "mxmlc -help list details" at 
> the command line:
> 
> -runtime-shared-library-path [path-element] [rsl-url] [policy-file-
> url] [rsl-url
> ] [policy-file-url]
>     alias -rslp
>      (repeatable)
> 
> The first argument is a path to a swc. You supplied C:\3.0.0
> \frameworks\rsls\framework_3.0.183453.swz which is incorrect. This 
> file is an RSL.
> The second argument is an URL to the RSL: You supplied nothing which 
> is why you got the error that an "rsl-url" is required.
> 
> The easiest why to try out the framework RSLs is to use the Beta 
> Flex 3 flex-config.xml and add static-rsls=false to the command 
> line. This will use the preconfigured "runtime-shared-library-path" 
> options setup in flex-config.xml. The preconfigured settings assume 
> you will copy framework_3.0.183453.swz and framework_3.0.183453.swf 
> from your sdk's framework RSLs directory to the same directory where 
> your application is deployed.
> 
> 
> -Darrell
> 
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "danielvlopes" <danielvlopes@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Darrell, i trying to do this:
> > -runtime-shared-library-path=C:\3.0.0
> \frameworks\rsls\framework_3.0.183453.swz,,framework_3.0.183453.swf
> > -target-player=9.0.60
> > 
> > like you said, but i getting error:
> > command line: Error: configuration variable
> > 'runtime-shared-library-path' requires a value for 'rsl-url'
> > 
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Darrell Loverin"
> > <darrell_loverin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, that is a correct way of using a swz (signed by Adobe) RSL. 
> The 
> > > first URL is framework_3.0.183453.swz. Since there is no path, 
> it 
> > > means you are deploying framework_3.0.183453.swz in the same 
> > > directory as your application. As was noted in a previous post, 
> the 
> > > rsls are located in the frameworks/rsls subdirectory of the SDK. 
> The 
> > > next parameter is the policy file URL which you have left blank 
> > > since a policy file not needed to read framework_3.0.183453.swz. 
> The 
> > > next URL, framework_3.0.183453.swf, is the failover URL in case 
> > > there is a problem reading framework_3.0.183453.swz. One problem 
> > > could be the player trying to load framework_3.0.183453.swz is 
> not 
> > > version 9.0.60 or greater. If that is the case then 
> > > framework_3.0.183453.swz will be skipped and 
> > > framework_3.0.183453.swf will be downloaded.
> > > 
> > > Since you have specified an unsigned swf RSL as a failover for 
> the 
> > > swz RSL, you don't need the -target-player option, but it is not 
> > > hurting anything.
> > > 
> > > What -target-player=9.0.60 does is tell the compiler that you 
> are 
> > > going to require player version 9.0.60 or higher in your html 
> > > wrapper. This will stop the compiler from complaining if you 
> specify 
> > > a swz RSL without a swf RSL as a failover.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Darrell
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "danielvlopes" 
> <danielvlopes@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Alex,
> > > > 
> > > > Let me understand... the right way is using swz?
> > > > 
> > > > Like this?
> > > >                 <exec executable="${flex.mxmlc}" dir="." 
> > > failonerror="false"
> > > > failifexecutionfails="no">
> > > >                         
> > > >                         <arg line="PainelAdmApp.mxml
> > > > -runtime-shared-library-path=C:\3.0.0
> > > 
> \frameworks\libs\framework.swc,framework_3.0.183453.swz,,framework_3.
> > > 0.183453.swf
> > > > -target-player=9.0.60 -services services-config.xml
> > > > -link-report=PainelAdmAppReport.xml -output
> > > > ${deploy.dir}/PainelAdmApp.swf" />
> > > >                 </exec> 
> > > > 
> > > > Why i`m use ANT the .swf and .swz of framework is not 
> generated?
> > > > 
> > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <aharui@> 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the rsl line is supposed to look like this:
> > > > >  
> > > > > -runtime-shared-library-
> > > path=C:\moxie\frameworks\libs\framework.swc,fram
> > > > > ework_3.0.183453.swz,,framework_3.0.183453.swf
> > > > >  
> > > > > This signifies the use of a digital signature for the rsl 
> > > which "turns
> > > > > on" the cross-domain rsl feature and requests that the rsl, 
> if 
> > > the
> > > > > signature is verifed, be stored in a special cache.
> > > > >  
> > > > > Your syntax is used for regular rsls which are only stored 
> in the
> > > > > browser cache.
> > > > >  
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > > 
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > > > Behalf Of danielvlopes
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 4:29 PM
> > > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Framework Caching not working
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks again alex. :-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > , "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry, I think the guy who owns this feature was on 
> vacation 
> > > this past
> > > > > > week. I'll try to look at it if I get a chance.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > ] On
> > > > > > Behalf Of danielvlopes
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 1:23 PM
> > > > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%
> > > 40yahoogroups.com> 
> > > > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Framework Caching not working
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Some one can help??
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > , "danielvlopes" <danielvlopes@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My flash player is 9,0,60,235
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Even i use Beta 2, caching still not working.
> > > > > > > I don't know why, some one can help?
> > > > > > > Something wrong with my buil.xml?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> 
> > > > > > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , Tom Chiverton 
> > > <tom.chiverton@>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wednesday 03 Oct 2007, danielvlopes@ wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I don't uderstand Alex, i not sure it is important 
> but 
> > > i'm using
> > > > > > flex
> > > > > > > > > builder 3 beta 1.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Beta 2 is out now, try that.
> > > > > > > > Also, what Player version do you have ? Only 9.0.60 or 
> > > better can
> > > > > > > make use of 
> > > > > > > > RSL.
> > > > > > > > It is my understanding that older players will fall 
> back to
> > > > > > loading the 
> > > > > > > > framework every time.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > > Tom Chiverton
> > > > > > > > Helping to vitalistically establish bricks-and-clicks
> > > > > architectures
> > > > > > > > on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
> > > > > <http://thefalken.livejournal.com> 
> > > > > > <http://thefalken.livejournal.com 
> > > <http://thefalken.livejournal.com> >
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > ****************************************************
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership 
> > > registered in
> > > > > > > England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose 
> > > registered
> > > > > > > office address is at St James's Court Brown Street 
> > > Manchester M2
> > > > > 2JF.
> > > > > > > A list of members is available for inspection at the 
> > > registered
> > > > > > > office. Any reference to a partner in relation to 
> Halliwells 
> > > LLP
> > > > > > > means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by The 
> Solicitors
> > > > > > > Regulation Authority.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > This email is intended only for the use of the 
> addressee 
> > > named
> > > > > above
> > > > > > > and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you 
> are 
> > > not the
> > > > > > > addressee you must not read it and must not use any 
> > > information
> > > > > > > contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other 
> than 
> > > Halliwells
> > > > > > > LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If 
> you 
> > > have
> > > > > > > received this email in error please delete it and notify 
> > > Halliwells
> > > > > > > LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > For more information about Halliwells LLP visit
> > > > > www.halliwells.com.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to