Wait... this is 3, I am on 2... I can't find a reference to this in Flex 2, is it a new feature of 3?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "ben.clinkinbeard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Parts&file=metadata_066_15.html > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "simonjpalmer" <simonjpalmer@> > wrote: > > > > I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3 > > and Java objects. > > > > I have a Java object > > > > package com.java > > class X > > { > > private String name; > > public String getName(){return name;} > > public void setName(String name){this.name=name;} > > } > > > > and an ActionScript object > > > > package com.as3 > > { > > [Managed] > > [RemoteClass(alias="com.java.X")] > > public class X > > { > > private var name:String; > > private var age:Number; > > } > > } > > > > this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth > > reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get > > a warning message from the framework on the server which says... > > > > "Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be > > found." > > > > This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a > > problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age > > contained an array of objects. > > > > What I think I need is something like the "transient" keyword in Java > > object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for > > persistence, or in this case transmission. > > > > Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this? > > > > Thanks > > >
