I'm pretty new to .net also, so I suppose flex data services would be about
the same learning curve.

FDS, would it have any advantages over taking a .net approach? I seem to
recall that FDS/LCDS has two way update notification/synching services or
something of that order, which I took to mean that the flex ui would be
updated passively if changes are made to the viewed data by another user?
Would that be hard to emulate in .net, or would fluorine or WebOrb be able
to help with that?

Fluorine would connect flex and the .net side. But I'm not clear what the
.net methods that you describe are exactly? Would they be a set of classes
that call sprocs in the sql server db, either built manually or as generated
by an ORM?

I'm not clear on the limitations of the free version of LCDS, and what it
costs if you need to go beyond the limitations of the free version?


Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> 
> 
> Flex does not talk to a database directly (except with AIR but I gather
> you're talking about a web app).  Flex talks to a back end which then can
> talk to a database.  Flex works really well with pretty much any back end,
> so if you're familiar with .NET stick to that, no reason to go to FDS/LCDS
> or anything else.
> 
> The best way to communicate between Flex and .NET is through AMF Remoting.
> With that you can call .NET methods directly and the middle-ware libraries
> take care of the details for you.  We use an open-source library called
> Fluorine but there is also a commercial library called WebOrb available.
> 
> http://fluorine.thesilentgroup.com/fluorine/index.html
> 
> You definitely want to start with Flex Builder 3.  No reason to use Flex
> Builder 2, the IDE is very stable.  You can choose to target either the
> Flex
> 2 or Flex 3 SDK's and that choice depends on your release date.  If you're
> releasing before about March 2008 then you may want to stick with the Flex
> 2
> SDK.  If later, then use Flex 3 SDK.  An exact date has not been announced
> for Flex 3 release, but they've said Q1 2008.
> 
> I would suggest ignoring Cairngorm for now--start out learning to develop
> flex apps and just use your pre-existing knowledge to partition out your
> apps well so you don't have an ugly mess of spaghetti code.  After you're
> more familiar with Flex you can decide if Cairngorm or any framework is
> right for you and your apps.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Sam
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> We're Hiring! Seeking a passionate developer to join our team building
> Flex
> based products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If
> interested
> contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Pengi
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:00 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Flex for database apps; compare to .net
> 
> 
> I am considering flex for building data centric applications for use over
> the
> lan or internet. I have some experience with .net and am curious to hear
> from other that are familiar with .net and how it compares. I have read a
> couple of times that Visual Studio might be considered 'ahead' of Flex
> Builder. But my #1 interest is being able to wire up sql databases to the
> ui
> in the simplest manner possible, ie not a ton of code.
> 
> For experiments with flex, I would most like to take apart a tutorial or
> sample app that does standard db crud stuff, with multiple forms, related
> tables, data entry, that sort of thing. Can someone point me to the best
> example app of this type? Most demo apps I've seen are not mostly about
> crud.
> 
> From what I've read, flex data services (or whatever it's been renamed as)
> has a free version that is ok to use for commercial purposes, though
> non-clustered. Not sure what the other limitations of the free version
> are?
> 
> I've read about Cairngorm, but am not really sure were it fits into the
> flex
> scheme.
> 
> Finally, would it be good to start with Flex 3 beta 2, or should I stick
> with Flex 2 for now?
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Flex-for-database-apps--compare-to-.net-tf4784184.html#a13942946
Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to