Gotcha. Maybe you should try sending cookies along with the request, I've heard it works well on the Flex team. :)
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That would make sense, but it would be up to the Player team since > EventDispatcher is a Player class. The Flex team can lobby the Player > team for new features, but we don't get everything we ask for. > > Gordon Smith > Adobe Flex SDK Team > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:35 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Am I the only one who wishes EventDispatcher > exposed its listeners? > > > > Why in subclasses and not EventDispatcher itself? > > Ben > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > , "Gordon Smith" <gosmith@> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone from Adobe have info on why its not and/or if it might > be > > someday? > > > > The Player's EventDispatcher class doesn't provide this capability, > > probably because it isn't part of the Document Object Model Level 3 > > Events Specification. (The Player obviously keeps a list of listeners, > > but this is done in C++ code and the list isn't exposed in > > ActionScript.) However, I suppose the framework could accomplish what > > you want by overriding addEventListener() and removeEventListener() in > > every subclass of EventDispatcher to keep track of the listeners. > Please > > file an enhancement request at http://bugs.adobe.com/flex. > <http://bugs.adobe.com/flex.> > > > > Gordon Smith > > Adobe Flex SDK Team > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > ] On > > Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard > > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 6:04 AM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [flexcoders] Am I the only one who wishes EventDispatcher > > exposed its listeners? > > > > > > > > Sometimes it would be really nice be able to access a list of > > currently attached listeners by doing something like > > myButton.listeners. Having that return a collection of objects that > > expose the event type and handler method would be nice and it doesn't > > seem like it would be that hard to implement since they're obviously > > already kept track of somewhere. > > > > Does anybody else wish this was provided? Does anyone from Adobe have > > info on why its not and/or if it might be someday? > > > > Thanks, > > Ben > > >
