Anyone have any other workarounds for this issue other than the subclass suggested on the bugs site? I'll try anything at this point.
Thanks in advance. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "mitek17" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Alex! > > Thanks for the comments. At least we all know that it will be fixed > eventually. > > Cheers, > Dmitri Girski. > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote: > > > > I just updated some info in the bug. It is deferred because the Player > > has some issues that we can't easily workaround that prevent us from > > having guaranteed solution. I added code for a temporary workaround > > that will hopefully work in 'more' cases but not all. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of mitek17 > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:51 PM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: PrintDataGrid variablerowheight issue > > > > > > > > Hooray! It is in the state of Deferred Closed. :( > > > > PS I am just using a workaround - in the function which does a > > printing layout (e.g. showPrint() in SDK help) I do the following: > > > > pdg_procedures.height +=5; > > > > This extra 5 pixels fix the problem. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > , "jf317820" <jf317820@> wrote: > > > > > > https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14174 > > <https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14174> > > > > > >
