Here it is: public function showPage(pageType:String):void { if(pageType == "single") { c_Header.includeInLayout=true; c_Header.visible = true; c_Footer.visible = true; c_Footer.includeInLayout = true;
//FIXME!!! this fix is to make 16 procs to be printed without cutting the last row pdg_Procedures.height +=5; pdg_Deposits.visible = true; pdg_Deposits.includeInLayout = true; } if(pageType == "first") { c_Header.includeInLayout=true; c_Header.visible = true; c_Footer.visible = false; c_Footer.includeInLayout = false; //another fix as includeInLayout & visible don't affect the PDG size pdg_.height += c_Footer.height; pdg_Deposits.visible = false; pdg_Deposits.includeInLayout = false; pdg_Procedures.height += pdg_Deposits.height; } if(pageType == "middle") { // The header won't be used again; hide it. c_Header.includeInLayout=false; c_Header.visible = false; //no need - it works when PDG is an only component on page //pdg_Procedures.height += c_Header.height; c_Footer.visible = false; c_Footer.includeInLayout = false; //no need - it works when PDG is an only component on page //pdg_Procedures.height += c_Footer.height; pdg_Deposits.visible = false; pdg_Deposits.includeInLayout = false; //no need - it works when PDG is an only component on page //pdg_Procedures.height += pdg_Deposits.height; } if(pageType == "last") { c_Header.includeInLayout=false; c_Header.visible = false; //have to do it to adjust PDG height pdg_Procedures.height += c_Header.height; c_Footer.visible = true; c_Footer.includeInLayout = true; pdg_Deposits.visible = true; pdg_Deposits.includeInLayout = true; } if(pageType == "last_deposits") { c_Header.includeInLayout=false; c_Header.visible = false; pdg_Procedures.visible = false; pdg_Procedures.includeInLayout = false; c_Footer.visible = false; c_Footer.includeInLayout = false; pdg_Deposits.visible = true; pdg_Deposits.includeInLayout = true; pdg_Deposits.height += c_Header.height; pdg_Deposits.height += c_Footer.height; pdg_Deposits.height += dg_Procedures.height; } //Update the DataGrid layout to reflect the results. validateNow(); //don't ask me why - but in this particular case //Flex places a grid with height = 0 //and it is still visible. if (pdg_Procedures.height == 0) { pdg_Procedures.visible = false; } } As you can see, I've got pretty complex layout: Header PDG Footer and second PDG Here the doPrint() function: if (l_printJob.start()) { m_thePrintView.width = l_printJob.pageWidth; m_thePrintView.height = l_printJob.pageHeight; m_thePrintView.showPage("single"); if(!m_thePrintView.pdg_Procedures.validNextPage) { l_printJob.addObject(m_thePrintView); } else { m_thePrintView.showPage("first"); l_printJob.addObject(m_thePrintView); m_thePrintView.m_iPageNumber++; while(true) { m_thePrintView.pdg_Procedures.nextPage(); m_thePrintView.showPage("last"); if(!m_thePrintView.pdg_Procedures.validNextPage) { l_printJob.addObject(m_thePrintView); m_thePrintView.m_iPageNumber++; while (m_thePrintView.pdg_Deposits.validNextPage) { m_thePrintView.pdg_Deposits.nextPage(); m_thePrintView.showPage("last_deposits"); l_printJob.addObject(m_thePrintView); m_thePrintView.m_iPageNumber++; } break; } else { m_thePrintView.showPage("middle"); l_printJob.addObject(m_thePrintView); m_thePrintView.m_iPageNumber++; } } } } l_printJob.send(); } Cheers, Dmitri. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "jf317820" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you're referring to the showPage() function, I tried your > suggestion and it's crashing the runtime...can you post more sample code? > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "mitek17" <mitek17@> wrote: > > > > as a I mentioned before - I am adding 5 pixels to the PDG while doing > > the layout. Works in my case so far. > > > > PS Strange, but includeInLayout=false & visible=false for the > > component which is placed _after_ the PDG don't work for me. I am > > changing the PDG height manually. > > > > Cheers, > > Smitri. > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "jf317820" <jf317820@> wrote: > > > > > > Anyone have any other workarounds for this issue other than the > > > subclass suggested on the bugs site? I'll try anything at this point. > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "mitek17" <mitek17@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex! > > > > > > > > Thanks for the comments. At least we all know that it will be fixed > > > > eventually. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dmitri Girski. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I just updated some info in the bug. It is deferred because the > > > Player > > > > > has some issues that we can't easily workaround that prevent > us from > > > > > having guaranteed solution. I added code for a temporary > workaround > > > > > that will hopefully work in 'more' cases but not all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > > > Behalf Of mitek17 > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:51 PM > > > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: PrintDataGrid variablerowheight issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hooray! It is in the state of Deferred Closed. :( > > > > > > > > > > PS I am just using a workaround - in the function which does a > > > > > printing layout (e.g. showPrint() in SDK help) I do the following: > > > > > > > > > > pdg_procedures.height +=5; > > > > > > > > > > This extra 5 pixels fix the problem. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > , "jf317820" <jf317820@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14174 > > > > > <https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14174> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >