If you're trying to produce a single SWC that works with both Flex 2 and Flex 3, you're trying to do something that the SDK team doesn't try to do. We don't guarantee that you can link a Flex 2 app against our Flex 3 SWCs, or vice versa, except that we try to support Flex 2 resource bundle SWCs in Flex 3 apps. I'm afraid that I don't have any advice on how to do what you want to do. My recommendation is to produce a Flex 2 SWC and a Flex 3 SWC if you have to support Flex 2. Gordon Smith Adobe Flex SDK Team
________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:28 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Seriously, what is the 'right' way to do default styles? Hehe, thanks for the reply Gordon. I wasn't referring to design view problems as I don't use it either. I was referring to the fact that it seems you are required to put a global selector in your defaults.css that includes styles for an untold number of components if you want the SWC to be compatible with Flex 2.x. as described here: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/99374. <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/99374.> Is it trying to use the defaults.css from my SWC to style the whole app? I am not trying to create a whole new theme or anything, I just want the styles for my component included, so I don't want to compile repeatedly until I figure out exactly what has to be in my global selector. As for examples in the framework, I've had a hard time finding ones that map to my scenario well as most of the style names specified in other style selectors simply get applied to a subcomponent. I would be more than happy to follow your lead if you can point me to some good examples to reference. Thanks, Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, I have to eat crow. : ) > > My fellow team members tell me that Flex Builder's design view doesn't > process the default.css file in 3rd party SWCs. I wasn't aware of this > because I'm on the SDK team, not the Flex Builder team, and when I use > Flex Builder I don't use design view. > > I'm going to go slink under my desk and let others opine on how to do > styles correctly in a way that will make Flex Builder happy. > > Gordon Smith > Adobe Flex SDK Team > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of Gordon Smith > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:43 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Seriously, what is the 'right' way to do > default styles? > > > > > the lack of definitive info on this topic is pretty amazing to me > > Ben, what could be more definitive than the approach that the Flex SDK > team takes for its own components? You don't have to follow our lead, > but I still think it counts as best practice. > > Flex framework SWCs, such as framework.swc and airframework.swc, contain > a defaults.css file, and this file references embeddable assets that are > also in the SWC. The "host of problems" you are referring to (and I > don't understand what they are) can't be any worse than those Flex > developers encounter simply by using the standard Flex SWCs. > > - Gordon > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:21 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [flexcoders] Seriously, what is the 'right' way to do default > styles? > > > > OK, the lack of definitive info on this topic is pretty amazing to me > so I would like to help get something out there once and for all. The > problem to which I am referring is how to define default yet > overridable styles for custom components, including times when those > styles require embedded assets. This has been discussed before, but > the threads seem to endorse differing methods and neither provides > much in the way of concrete examples. > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/98546?threaded=1&p <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/98546?threaded=1&; p> > =8 > <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/98546?threaded=1&; <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/98546?threaded=1&; > > p=8> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/94547 <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/94547> > <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/94547 <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/94547> > > > I will use my personal efforts as an example here because its fairly > complex and I think if we can define a solution for it then most other > scenarios will be covered in the process. I have a component, > MDIWindow. I want its style to point to other styles (as seen in Panel > with titleStyleName and various other places in the Flex framework) > with properties named focusStyleName and noFocusStyleName. Those > "second-level" styles will then embed assets and contain a > ClassReference directive. The end user should be able to define a > MDIWindow style in their CSS but should also be able to specify > styleName on an instance and have it point to alternate styles (all > MDIWindow instances should not have to be styled the same). > > The classConstruct() static method + AS and defaultFactory() > (mentioned by Alex above as probably the best option) works well for > defining the MDIWindow type selector styles but falls short of > supporting the styleName path since its static and cannot reference > instance properties. > > The CSS approach (recommended by Gordon above) has issues when it > comes to embedding assets in the resulting SWC (I think) unless you > use the defaults.css approach, but that comes with its own host of > problems (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/99374 <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/99374> > <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/99374 <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/message/99374> > ). > > I (and many others I think) are simply looking for an approach that is > flexible, compatible with Flex 2.x and preferably has the "recommended > by Adobe" stamp. I figure at the very least maybe we can get two of > the SDK engineers to duke it out (Deepa, you're in charge of > photgraphing), and hopefully whoever can still use a keyboard > afterwards will post a wonderfully detailed diatribe on the "right" > way to do default styles. > > Thanks! > Ben >
