Hi

Wouldn't that send the arguments as an array but as just 1 argument ?
see the e.g at 

http://blogs.adobe.com/fcheng/2008/03/proposed_splat_operator_in_ecm.html

(the second box )

I like prototyping! And anyhow as I said I am working with AS2 and I
work with BOTH prototype and class-based inheritance.


Regards
Devdatta

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If I extend a class and in the subclass override a function of the
> base class
> > I can call the original base class function using super.functionname.
> > How do I pass all the arguments present in the arguments array to the
> > super function?
> 
>  
> 
> If a superclass has the method with a variable number of arguments like
> 
>  
> 
>     public function f(...args):void
> 
>     {
> 
>         ...
> 
>     }
> 
>  
> 
> then in a subclass the override would call the supermethod like this:
> 
>  
> 
>     override public function f(...args):void
> 
>     {
> 
>         super.f(args);
> 
>         ...
> 
>     }
> 
>  
> 
> > there is no mention of the prototype property I could find
> 
>  
> 
> I'm curious what you're doing with the 'prototype' property. It's pretty
> much vestigial at this point because AS3 uses class-based, rather than
> prototype-based, inheritance.
> 
>  
> 
> Gordon Smith
> 
> Adobe Flex SDK Team
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of dev.bits
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:34 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Inheritance : Calling super.function with var
> args
> 
>  
> 
> dude, you are awesome! it worked 
> 
> I was looking for invoke (thats what javascript has for doing this)
> and couldn't find it. I had seen that page (not apply but that page)
> and had ignored it considering the huge differences between AS3 and
> AS2 (I wanted something for AS2, which I now realise I never mentioned
> :). <rant> The adobe AS2 documentation is a real pain .. there is no
> mention of the prototype property I could find </rant>
> 
> anyways, thanks a lot for the awesome help (and the quick replies! )
> 
> Regards
> Devdatta
> 
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> , "Josh McDonald" <dznuts@> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry mate, that's my bad! you want .apply, not .call! My fault, I
> should've
> > double-checked before I posted!
> > 
> > http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/langref/Function.html#apply
> <http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/langref/Function.html#apply> ()
> > 
> > -Josh
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, dev.bits <dev.akhawe@> wrote:
> > 
> > > yeah I had tried that ! :)
> > >
> > > But it doesn't work ... I thought it was the problem "this" but
> > > clearly this doesn't work :
> > > flash.external.ExternalInterface.call.call(null,arguments);
> > > doesn't work .
> > > but
> > > flash.external.ExternalInterface.call.call(null,"alert","whoa");
> > >
> > > works. So I guess we come back to the same problem... arguments
> passes
> > > the args as 1 argument (an array) whereas we want to pass the each
> > > member of the arguments array as an argument each.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Devdatta
> > >
> > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Josh McDonald" <dznuts@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ah, you didn't say it was a static function :)
> > > >
> > > > Just put "null" instead of "this" and it should work.
> > > >
> > > > -Josh
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:36 PM, dev.bits <dev.akhawe@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Doesn't work for me .. says "this" not accessible ...
> > > > >
> > > > > See this code for e.g :
> > > > > class package1.subpackage.newExternalInterface extends
> > > > > flash.external.ExternalInterface{
> > > > > public static function call(methodName:String):Object{
> > > > > trace("called
> newExternalInterface.called");
> > > > >
> > > > > return
> > > > > flash.external.ExternalInterface.call.call(this,arguments);
> > > > > //Compiler says this not accessible from this scope
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Devdatta
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Josh McDonald" <dznuts@>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Try:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > super.functionName.call(this, argsArray);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Josh
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:14 AM, dev.bits <dev.akhawe@>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If I extend a class and in the subclass override a
> function of the
> > > > > > > base class I can call the original base class function using
> > > > > > > super.functionname
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But what do I do if this function excepts variable number of
> > > > > arguments ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How do I pass all the arguments present in the arguments
> array
> > > to the
> > > > > > > super function?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > public override function a(){
> > > > > > > super.a( // here I want to pass ALL the arguments that
> were passed
> > > > > > > // to this function
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > Devdatta
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > > > > > > FAQ:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt> 
> > > > > > > Search Archives:
> > > > > > >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo> !
> > > Groups
> > > > > > > Links
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It
> tolls for
> > > > > thee."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > > > > > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > > > > FAQ:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt> 
> > > > > Search Archives:
> > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo> !
> Groups
> > > > > Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for
> > > thee."
> > > >
> > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > > > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > --
> > > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > > FAQ:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt> 
> > > Search Archives:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo> ! Groups
> > > Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for
> thee."
> > 
> > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> > :: 0437 221 380 :: josh@
> >
>


Reply via email to