Will,
I agree that the consequences of failure drive the intensity of the efforts to ensure reliability. I was objecting to the philosophy that Dave's comment seemed to be promoting and was merely using my work experience as an extreme counter-example. His statement, "Remember, you are not responsible for making the system perform, you are only responsible for reporting its failures to meet delivery guarantees." implies that it is acceptable to deliver to a customer a product known to be faulty as long as it tells the customer why it failed. Thankfully, any company with that philosophy is probably not going to survive very long in the marketplace. Definitely Flex does NOT fall into that category. This discussion has gone WAY off topic & therefore this will be my last comment on it. 73, Ray, K9DUR http://k9dur.info _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using alpha and beta versions of the software.
