The WBIR problem is fundamental to the SDR-1000; there is no firmware to store the starting point phase and gain values for IR, so every time there is a new signal image to null, it has to do a complete from the beginning nulling routine since it doesn't have that seed data to utilize. Add lots of new signals and you start having issues like you described.
You may be right that 1.18.3 might be better for the transverter stuff. I never used my SDR1K with transverters. Thanks for the insight. -Tim -----Original Message----- From: Al Ward [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 1:57 PM To: Tim Ellison; 'Edwin Marzan'; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: 'Flex Edge Reflector'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [FlexEdge] SDR1000 No TX Tim I would agree except there were some issues with transverter gain settings that would have no effect on the panadapter. I always liked 1.18.3 which does not have that bug, I believe. Right now I am running my SDR-1000 with version 2.0.22 and it works fine for driving a transverter. My only dislike is the ever changing WBIR which works fine for my 1500 and 5000 but on the 1000 it does not seem to have any memory of what worked before. On a quiet band like 2M most of the time when a large signal shows up, it starts its routine of refinding infinate image rejection. Really a pain as sometimes the image rejection is only 10 dB and the image covers up a signal that I am really interested in. I would be happy with setting it like we did in the old days manualy and being happy with 50 dB. My 4 cents. 73 Al W5LUA -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 5:47 PM To: Edwin Marzan; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Flex Edge Reflector; [email protected] Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] SDR1000 No TX Version 1.18.6 was very stable for the SDR-1000 -Tim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Edwin Marzan Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 8:46 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Flex Edge Reflector; [email protected] Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] SDR1000 No TX This is probably not a good time to get on Flex's case for not fixing the transmit bug. The folks have a lot on their plate right now and need to concentrate on what is going to keep them afloat and flexible. Is there an official release of PowerSDR that prevents the SDR-1000 from transmitting? Of course not. It ain't gonna happen in the foreseeable future. From what I read, Gerald and co purchased SDR-1000 with a serial number 1 from it's original owner and plan to display it with the latest version of the software which will prove that SDR-1000 users will not be left behind. But just remember The Radioshack TRS-80 had an expansion port that was supposed to keep it from becoming obsolete and we all know what happened to that one! Edwin Marzan AB2VW > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:58:23 -0500 > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] SDR1000 No TX > > AMEN! > > Alpha is alpha. Beta is beta. > > Fully integrated/certified hardware & software are what start the > revenue flow that brings all the other good things. > > Most companies don't release products until they're ready for prime > time, especially in the ham radio world. Then the products have a > relatively limited support life cycle. > > FLEX breaks the mold and willing to let their customers play with > stuff under development, let the customers be part of the product > evolution, even it means "airing the dirty laundry". FLEX must > sometimes kick themselves cuz they can't win for trying. > > Keep up the good work, FLEX, and keep your business model alive; it's > working. > > 73 > > Dan > K0DAN > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Neal Campbell" <[email protected]> > To: "Gerald Youngblood" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]>; "Stig LA4WAA" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:05 PM > Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] SDR1000 No TX > > > > Being a guy who makes a living from writing software, I must admit > > some exasperation with the implications of this thread: > > 1. A product whose marketing life ended 3+ years ago should receive > > "urgent" > > attention from a company whose resources are scarce and focus is > > properly set on meeting the market demands of today and tomorrow 2. > > A bug that is judged as easy to fix on a long-discontinued product > > (how that determination was however made) is more important than the > > strategic objectives of a company as judged by its management 3. > > Just because a company is transparent enough to provide public > > access to its Alpha code, without qualification of expertise, > > strategic importance or even knowledge of who is doing it, it has an > > obligation to provide a minute of its CEO's time to explain why they > > do what they do. > > > > The only way we get our radio toys, outstanding support and a future > > confident that we will continue to do so is for FlexRadio Systems to > > be a profitable, viable concern. I am willing to bet that the amount > > of money made by Flex on the sales of a SDR-1000 over the past three > > years would not purchase a cup of coffee at Starbucks. I do not mean > > to demean people who own SDR1Ks, it is a great radio that served as > > my entry point into this most fascinating part of the hobby. But, > > like it or not, the SDR1K does not provide anything but a cost to > > Flex (outside of a marketing tool to show what great customer > > support it provides). I suspect that the radio holds a special place > > in Gerald's heart because otherwise any other CEO would just wish > > those users the best and not even discuss anything but products > > currently offered for sale. > > > > I know that we all see the world thru our own perspectives, but > > please, Flex, keep focused on meeting your strategic goals, ensuring > > a future for new products and support by making a decent profit and > > don't worry about reflector noise! > > 73 > > > > Neal Campbell > > Abroham Neal Software > > www.abrohamnealsoftware.com > > (540) 645 5394 NEW PHONE NUMBER > > > > Amateur Radio: K3NC > > Blog: http://www.abrohamnealsoftware.com/blog/ > > DXBase bug reports: email to [email protected] Abroham Neal > > forums: http:/www.abrohamnealsoftware.com/community/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Gerald Youngblood > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Dear Stig, > >> > >> Bug fixes in alpha code, including "big faults" will be addressed > >> *after* we complete new product integration as publicly stated. > >> Those new products generate the revenue that pays for engineers who > >> write the code that supports the free upgrades our customers > >> currently receive. > >> > >> Thanks for your patience. > >> > >> Gerald > >> > >> Gerald Youngblood, K5SDR > >> President and CEO > >> FlexRadio Systems(TM) > >> 13091 Pond Springs Road, #250 > >> Austin, TX 78729 > >> Phone: 512-535-4713 Ext. 202 > >> Email: [email protected] > >> Web: www.flex-radio.com > >> > >> Tune In Excitement (TM) > >> > >> PowerSDR(TM) is a trademark of FlexRadio Systems > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Stig LA4WAA <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Just a comment to my own posting: > >> > > >> > Yes I also use the 1.18.5 version now, and I'm rather happy with that. > >> > We all know PB-Pal is alphacode and so on....... > >> > > >> > But when I can't transmit, I'll say that is not just a bug but a > >> > BIG > >> FAULT, > >> > with the test-version. Then it won't be used, and then no other > >> > small > >> bugs > >> > will be discovered by me. > >> > But we must accept their priority, and wait...OK. > >> > > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > Stig > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > >> > Fra: Stig LA4WAA [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > Sendt: 14. mars 2010 21:21 > >> > Til: [email protected] > >> > Emne: Re: [FlexEdge] SDR1000 No TX > >> > > >> > Same here... > >> > I wonder why such a MAJOR problem for a lot Of us SDR-1000 user > >> > wasn't fixed right away. > >> > What are they thinking??? > >> > The problem came after SVN 3528. It cant be that hard? > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Stig... la4waa > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Flexedge mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.b > >> > iz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called > >> > FlexEdge. It is > >> used > >> > for posting topics related to SDR software development and > >> experimentalist > >> > who are using alpha and beta versions of the software. > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Flexedge mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz > >> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It > >> is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and > >> experimentalist who are using alpha and beta versions of the > >> software. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Flexedge mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz > > This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It > > is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and > > experimentalist who are using alpha and beta versions of the software. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flexedge mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz > This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is > used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using alpha and beta versions of the software. _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using beta versions of the software. _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using beta versions of the software. _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are using beta versions of the software.
