I do have a Rubidium 10mhz source that I feed into my flex.

I think that the PT160 approach is a good approach.  I could use one of these 
units and zero beat to the incoming signal.  I presume that I will have to 
correct DDS error in the PTS160 as well.  I should be able to look at the zero 
beat on my scope.

Will the audio chain in the Flex software pass thru low enough frequency to get 
a zero beat?

Thank's for the info on the Paranormal Challenge.  (I am able to move chess 
pieces around on a chess board by merely lookin at them, will that qualify?)

George
K2CM
(Yes, FMT sickness has taken hold here)

________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on 
behalf of Alfred Green [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 3:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] Frequency Measurement and the Flex (once again)

On 5/21/2011 11:37 AM, AA8K73 GMail wrote:
>
>
> As your FMT sickness progresses, you will be concerned about the
> accuracy of the 10 MHz reference that you feed into the Flex. At this
> time I am satisfied with a Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO.
>
There are also some good Rubidium sources available cheaply. At least
1e-9 accuracy without tweaking. There are GPS-disciplined Rubidium
oscillators around, probably the best you can do at the ham level
without having access to a Caesium source. The Thunderbolt is very good,
however.

>
> You will also discover that as you tune PowerSDR, the frequency may be
> slightly off the Hertz shown, due to DDS rounding.

Yes, but the DDS algorithm is known (with SR off), so for a given PSDR
indicated frequency in Hz, it is possible to back-calculate what the
true frequency is. I seem to remember someone (Brian?) doing
measurements on this, and it is completely repeatable. I don't recall
the calculation, but it is available.

>
> I want to experiment with a marker signal that I can derive from my
> GPSDO, although I try to do the FMT with just the transceiver and the
> GSPDO.
>
>
You can pickup a PTS160 synthesizer pretty cheaply, and that will give
you markers to 0.1Hz when locked to a good reference (standard option).
For finer spacing, use a simple divide by 10 and get markers up to 16MHz
at 10mHz accuracy.

I've got all the gear to do it; I really must participate in a FMT at
some point. I have however used similar techniques to measure the
frequency of a 1296 beacon to a few tens of milliHerz.

GL & 73,  Alf  NU8I
Scottsdale  AZ  DM43an
160m > 24Gigs


_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.
_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.

Reply via email to