At 10:52 AM 9/21/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote: >The signal strength is accurate even at the edges (or at least, very close >to it...perhaps a slight roll-off). But more importantly, you will not be >able to see very weak signals that because of the elevated noise floor (i.e. >the humps). The screenshot will clear this up. Signals will still be >recorded, but the humps may cover them up if they are right near the >"normal" noise floor. Hopefully that didn't muddy the waters. :) > >I can verify that you can indeed record a full 192kHz with signals all the >way across the passband. I didn't notice the images being any different >than any other card.
I would assume this with the same default 11kHz "IF".. but what if you actually tuned the IF over to, say, 40 kHz Or, if you, for instance, had the Main Rx tuned to one signal, and tuned a Sub Rx to something 30 kHz away, what happens to the image rejection for the SubRx? It could be pretty flat, or it could be pretty wretched. Have you tried feeding in a signal from a signal generator at say, 150 kHz or 200 kHz and seen if it shows up at 42 or 8kHz (and at what level)? This would help evaluate what sort of roofing filter they have in the Edirol. _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
