Receivers are easy to do. Transceivers are more difficult and have greater data throughput requirements.
-Tim -----Original Message----- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of a...@mchsi.com Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 4:41 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] Firewire vs. USB vs. Ethernet Firewire vs. USB vs. Ethernet Something still bothers me about this USB vs Firewire issue. Since USB works fine with the 1500, but is not accceptable for the 3000 or 5000, the greater receive bandwidth of the latter two must be the limiting factor. What is different about the Perseus that allows USB to be used for recording up to 1.6M of spectrum? According to Rob Sherwood the two receivers test close to the top of the heap with the perseus posting marginally better numbers. Note - I am a happy 1500 owner and am seriously thinking about a 5000 at Dayton. Keith AC9S _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/ _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
