Jim Wilson writes: > Anyone working on an airspeed dial? If not I'll make one, probably > tomorrow.
That would be great. We need one calibrated up to 260kt for the C310 -- here's a picture of what I think is the right one: http://www.ramaircraft.com/Catalog/Gauges/airspeed.jpg > Also have made a tiny bit of progress on a 3D panel model...but > it's at the point where it could be either a c310 or c172 with a > little stretching here and there (given my 'experience' with AC3D > there's a good chance I'll start over anyway). Any ideas on which > is a better one to start with? Am leaning toward the c172 because > if nothing else it'll have fewer items to position. That's a hard call -- there's a good case for each as the starting aircraft. The C172 has a much simpler powerplant, but the user will have to deal with p-factor on takeoff; the C310 has counter-rotating engines (therefore no p-factor), but more complex powerplant and a fuller panel (and gear to worry about). All the best, David -- David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
