On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 07:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> [Is there a more standard way to get a 64-bit integer, like "int64_t" in > <stdint.h> of ANSI C'99? This warning only appears when "-pedantic" is > used, and can be inhibited with -Wno-long-long. This bunch of warnings > came out four times.] My experience has been that types such as int32_t are not as portable as they should be. I can't remember the exact problem, but I had a problem with it either not being available on all my platforms (I think one had int32 or int_32 and the other had int32_t) or they were not available from the same header on all platforms. My platforms were Solaris II, LynxOS (a real-time OS), and NT. I wish I could remember which was the case. Anyway, out solution was to define our own. Doesn't plib define some portable types? FWIW, Jonathan Polley _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
