David Megginson wrote: > Jim Wilson writes: > > > There must be a reason for not having it hard coded, but I can't > > think of what it would be. Is this just to make minor > > spelling/syntax corrections without rebuilding...or are you looking > > toward supporting multiple languages? > > It would be interesting to make options themselves configurable, as > in > > <PropertyList> > > <option> > <name>heading</name> > <arg>true</arg> > <property>/orientation/heading-deg</property> > <description>Initial heading in degrees true.</description> > </option>
> > <!-- and so on --> > > </PropertyList> > > It would be much easier to keep the help text up-to-date this way, > though a few of the options would be trickier (the ones that require > special parsing of the argument, for example). Any volunteers? Hmm, good thinking. I have to think about it some more to see the implications. Erik _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
