James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> (I want to get the flight-plans hooked up to the existing 
> auto-pilot code, which isn't really designed to look like a 'big jet' 
> model of course, though it seems you already have code *somewhere* that 
> handles LNAv and VNAV functions... hmm.

You might want to hold off on that piece for now,  the autopilot code is
getting re-written.  The current code will follow the waypoints in the current
waypoint list.  But, if you want to do this in the most flexible way, it seems
that your subsystem should be feeding the autopilot lower level target data as
required (i.e. modes, headings, pitches, altitudes), through the property
interface.  The new code will still follow radials and probably the current
waypoint functionality will remain, so you could always feed target data
through the waypoint interface.

As far as "autopiloting" is concerned, I'm not sure of the extent of what you
are trying to model.  AFIK, even if you've filed a plan and are using a flight
computer you still need to clear before climbing or descending, so
automatically changing FL and going into climb or descent when a given
waypoint is reached would not be accurate behavior.  But perhaps I am
misunderstanding this.

Best,

Jim

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to