On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jon Stockill wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Luff wrote: > > > Could this be a gotcha with how the heading is specified in runways.dat eg > > 54.64 vs 234.64? > > Probably - I hadn't really investigated - I just noticed it when taking > the screenshots, and was going to try and track it down tonight. A EGXG 29 CYY Church Fenton R EGXG 06 53.834424 -1.195608 54.64 6140 151 NAPHN NNPN 543 0 NNPN R EGXG 16 53.837399 -1.197656 156.05 5455 151 NARHN NNPN 0 0 NNPN
Apologies for the odd line breaks, but that *looks* correct. -- Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
