Erik Hofman wrote:
Take a look here: http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/comparison.html
This table is based on performance reports from FlightGear users who have sgi equipment. But be aware that this is about the default startup position (stationary at KSFO) which seems a bit heavy on the scenery for alder hardware.
I have the impression that the default position is very un-representative - because of two reasons:
1.) If you get only 3 fps and do some modifications on the hardware, an improvement of 10 % won't get noticed, because FG still talks about 3 fps, 2.) The amount of objects that are in viewable range on the default position varies very much over the time,
True, and at the moment it's probably the worst place in FlightGear (performance wise). But it's hard to ask someone to give me the framerate for another controlled situation.
Startup at KSFO is default.
Erik
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
