Jon S Berndt said:

> On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 18:58:03 +0200
>   Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >JSBSim does basically the same (although there is a name allocated 
> >for it), but the real question is: Is left most defined 0, or is 
> >right mos define d0, or is it something completely different 
> >(numbered in order of appearance)?
> >
> >Erik
> 
> Here is an example of our gear definition:
> 
> AC_GEAR NOSE -6.8 .0 -20.0 1800 600 .5 .8 .02 STEERABLE NONE 10 FIXED
> AC_GEAR L_MAIN 58.2 -43.0 -17.9 5400 1600 .5 .8 .02 CASTERED LEFT 0 
> FIXED
> AC_GEAR R_MAIN 58.2 43.0 -17.9 5400 1600 .5 .8 .02 CASTERED RIGHT 0 
> FIXED
> AC_GEAR TAIL_SKID 188.0 .0 8.0 20000 1000 .2 .2 .2 FIXED NONE 0 FIXED
> AC_GEAR LEFT_TIP 43.2 -214.8 59.4 10000 2000 .2 .2 .2 FIXED NONE 0 
> FIXED
> AC_GEAR RIGHT_TIP 43.2 214.8 59.4 10000 2000 .2 .2 .2 FIXED NONE 0 
> FIXED
> 
> See, we have contact points in addition to actual wheeled bogeys 
> defined. The X, Y, Z coords of the contact point for each gear us 
> there, as are the static and dynamic friction coefficients, rolling 
> resistance, steering type, brake group membership, maximum steering 
> angle, and retreactability.
> 
> They are not now expected to be in any particular order, nor are they 
> given specific names. The layout is somewhat free form. A questions 
> is, how do you set up the gear model to support animation when you may 
> want to model things as varied as a 747, a C-172, a P-51D, a Harrier, 
> etc.?
> 
> Perhaps there should be another identifier that relates a specific 
> gear instance with an associated 3D model gear item?  Perhaps there 
> ought to be an ordering standard? Suggestions?
> 

That looks easy enough.  If there aren't any indications otherwise, the order
they are listed in the config file would be fine.

Maybe adding the text description in the gear/gear[n] path (the NOSE, L_MAIN,
R_MAIN, etc) might help someone trying to figure out which was which.  But of
course they could just look at the config file and count (e.g. R_MAIN must be
gear[2]).

Best,

Jim


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to