Scrubbing FlightGear because of framerates was excatly what a friend of mine did. I agree with Innis that someone should fix this problem.
Regards, Ampere On July 17, 2004 10:08 am, Innis Cunningham wrote: > The following tests were done using windows 98SE > The old box was a 850meg duron with 256 meg ram and > a GF4-MX-440 64meg graphics card.On this box I could get 27fps > sitting at the end of 28R at KSFO looking at the terminal. > The new box a 2gig athalon with 512meg ram and a FX5200 > 128meg graphics card could only give 22fps under the same > conditions.Also my son who has a 2.8 gig rig running an ATI 9800pro > card could only get 15fps.It seems the more powerfull the computer > the slower FG seems to run. > Now I dont know why that is but if we want to get new people into > FG we should see what the problem is. > As my son says if he had downloaded the game(sorry sim)and seen these > kind of results he would have just scrubed it and moved on and I guess > there are a lot of other people who would do the same thing. > My son says that he gets frame rates of well over 100 on Quake and Doom > which seem to be much more graphics intensive than FG. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
